![]() Fourth, the paper discusses the MNW model's partial solutions to the diversity paradox and the Leontief technology paradox as well as the possibilities of further developing and applying the MNW model. Then the focus turns to exchange in intermediate goods and the related problems of the specialisation of R&D. This presentation starts from firms that produce their intermediate goods by means of labour and knowledge. Third, the bare bones of the multiactivity generalisation of the NW model, the MNW model, is presented. With given technologies the LNW model shows standard replicator dynamics while it can also be used as a testbed for exploring different R&D regimes. This version of the NW model, the LNW model, includes only labour and knowledge. Second, the paper develops a condensed version of the NW model that serves to highlight the theoretical problems and as a platform for the proposed generalisation. Thus there is still a need to confront what may be called the diversity paradox and the Leontief technology paradox of evolutionary modelling. The conclusion is that this model gives an ad hoc solution to the tendency of evolutionary models to produce monopoly and that is has not really confronted the 'knife-edge' problems of the underlying Leontief technology. First, there is a discussion of some practical difficulties and core theoretical problems in relation to the standard NW model of Schumpeterian competition. The argument and the solution is presented in four steps. This paper proposes a multiactivity generalisation of the Nelson-Winter model, or the NW model, in order to turn the attention of evolutionary minded economists toward specialisation and exchange, the emergence of markets for intermediate goods, the specialisation of R&D, and other issues of multisectoral growth and development. tex: the source file gives the full information about your document but it is dependent on styles, bibliographies, etc., which may be idiosyncratic to your L A T E X system therefore, you have to consider carefully the simplest possible set of files that can be handled by friends or publishers with their own L A T E X systems and formatting preferences dvi and ps: the first is well-suited for receivers who have a viewer included in their own L A T E X systems the latter is for printing and viewing by all technically oriented users pdf: the pdf file is most adequate for web publishing since it can be inspected before printing by nearly all receivers (by means of Acrobat Reader) Since the pdf format has a diverse set of users that largely perform at least a preliminary inspection on their computer screen, the precise functioning of the document is worth quite some considerations. There are many ways of distributing your L A T E X output (see Goossens et al., 1997 Goossens and Rahtz, 1999).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |